State funding banks

Discussion in 'General Trading Discussion' started by Gelsemium, May 12, 2014.

  1. JR Ewing

    JR Ewing Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2014
    Posts:
    4,950
    Likes Received:
    39

    Sometimes they just lie and say whatever they think the majority want to hear so that they can get elected.
     
  2. Kate

    Kate Senior Investor

    Joined:
    Apr 2014
    Posts:
    515
    Likes Received:
    5
    Uh... "sometimes" JR? You are being very generous today, yes? :)
     
  3. Gelsemium

    Gelsemium Senior Investor

    Joined:
    Apr 2014
    Posts:
    937
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yeah LOL, all of the time, they are huge liars and their speech is poll oriented and not action intended...
     
  4. InterestedInvesto

    InterestedInvesto Active Member

    Joined:
    May 2014
    Posts:
    44
    Likes Received:
    1
    Umm... Which banks in particular are you talking about? And would you be able to cite some sources for otherwise this could be written off as unsourced speculation.
     
  5. Strykstar

    Strykstar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2014
    Posts:
    370
    Likes Received:
    1
    Success in politic is sadly not measure by what you do or by who you are able to help, it is just measured by whether you get elected or not, so they alter their speech to whatever keeps them in their position.
     
  6. crimsonghost747

    crimsonghost747 Senior Investor

    Joined:
    Mar 2014
    Posts:
    1,722
    Likes Received:
    6
    Seeing as these banks are privately owned, I think it's the investors that should suffer the consequences of bad decision making by the bank. If the banks falls, then it falls. Pumping in government money will not cure the problem, it will just make the banks do more risky stuff in hopes of greater profits since now they know that if it falls apart them someone else will pay for the losses.

    Look at Ireland. As far as I can remember they let some of the banks fall down and now everything is back to normal.
     
  7. Peninha

    Peninha Senior Investor

    Joined:
    Apr 2014
    Posts:
    602
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't know the exact case of Ireland, but dropping banks sometimes means that the people with their deposits there lose everything because the bank leaders have their share secure...
     
  8. JR Ewing

    JR Ewing Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2014
    Posts:
    4,950
    Likes Received:
    39
    Yeah, I'm usually voting for the lesser of 2 evils, or against the greater of 2 evils.

    What I want is a small, limited govt that does little more than take reasonable steps to protect us from legit harm and fraud. And a more business-friendly country with less taxation, crime, and regulations, along with adherence to the Constitution.
     
  9. Gelsemium

    Gelsemium Senior Investor

    Joined:
    Apr 2014
    Posts:
    937
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yeah, that would be optimal JR, the problem is that the back office is the real government and what we see is just a representation, like a side-show. Some of the truth is always known though.
     
  10. crimsonghost747

    crimsonghost747 Senior Investor

    Joined:
    Mar 2014
    Posts:
    1,722
    Likes Received:
    6
    I'm not too familiar with Irelands case either. But seeing as the government protects your investments up to a certain limit, no one would lose everything. Rich people MIGHT lose something depending on how it's done. But it did work out well for them and this is how it should be done... I really don't see the point in throwing tax payers money into banks that are privately owned.
     

Share This Page